Thursday, November 4, 2010

Bad Religion

I found Timothy Morton’s presentation on hyper objects interesting but slightly too abstract to be easily understood. However, the presentation did give me a new understanding into the green movement. I realized that the green movement is religion for the modern era. Recycling, driving less, turning off lights are all rituals that a person performs in order to feel like they are in control of their future. A person who prays does so because it makes them feel like they are in control of where they are going to be in the afterlife. “Going green” serves the same psychological purpose, a person who recycles finds comfort in the daily ritual because they believe, perhaps subconsciously, that it will save the world, it gives them the feeling of control over their future. It even mimics religion in the way it is structured. Those who have already gone green preach the ideals of the green movement to the masses in an attempt to convert them. People who drive hybrid cars are seen as the most devout followers of the faith. In actuality, one person recycling is not going to make any difference on the environment, even a million people recycling probably does not make much of a difference. Because like religion, the green movement will never be able to convert enough people to make a difference and even if they could it would not matter because whatever humanity has done to the environment and the climate is irreversible. Don’t get me wrong I’m totally for alternative energy and energy conservation; I just think that we shouldn’t fool ourselves into thinking that by recycling we are on some sort of higher moral plain.

5 comments:

  1. Interesting points. Near the end, however, I think you make assumptions that you haven't built up well enough to yet to assert.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think you get away from the point you made at the beginning. You compare the green movement to religion, but you don't really explain how Timothy Morton's lecture inspired this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that at the beginning, you are simply responding to the lecture, which is fine, but at the end when you talk about how one person cannot truly make an imprint on the environment, this is where the piece has the potential to grow. I might consider starting with this idea, and going from there.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think your comparison to religion is very good but you get distracted at the end. The piece started off interesting then got slightly confusing.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I completely agree with you and even think that your criticism could be more brutal. It is so ironic to watch people drive up to wholefoods in their S.U.V.s and pat themselves on the back for using a reusable shopping bag for all of their organic, plastic wrapped products. That s/aid, go further, what do you think should be done? Was industrialism the beginning of the end? Maybe we are an invasive species. Do you think we have the choice of whether or not to perpetuate this fact individually?

    ReplyDelete